- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23815 W.P. No.26260/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.26260/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. NIPPON INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY PVT. LTD. A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.26/501, IV FLOOR, EASTEND APARTMENTS NR METRO STATION, MAYUR VIHAR PHASE I EXTENSION, ASHOKNAGAR NEW DELHI-110091 REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. PARWEZ AHMED SON OF LATE ANWAR AHMED ZAMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: M/S. CONFIDENT DENTAL EQUIPMENTS LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT POST BOX NO.7939 PETE CHANNAPPA ESTATE MAGADI MAIN ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE-560079 REP. HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. B. PRAKASH CHANDRA SHETTY MAJOR. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S. SHAKER SHETTY, ADV.,) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23815 W.P. No.26260/2019 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR SUCH OTHER WRITS/DIRECTIONS QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD:17.6.2019 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN EX PTN.NO.2860/2016 [ANNEXURE-A] AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SAID EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS AS BEING NOT MAINTAINABLE & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER No representation for the petitioner. 2. On 11.06.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has returned the brief to his client. On 23.06.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner has again made the submission that he retires from the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for retirement on 23.06.2025. The memo indicates that the office copy of the retirement notice is issued by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the postal receipt is also produced along with the memo. However, the acknowledgement for service of retirement notice is not produced and there is no representation for the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23815 W.P. No.26260/2019 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9