Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18743 WP No. 2310 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 2310 OF 2015 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUGUNA W/O SRI J JAYACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.5, BYRAVESHWARA LAYOUT, OPP. RITA GIRLS HOME, HENNUR BANDE, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 043.
2.
SRI. T.V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.6, 4TH CROSS OPP. SUMANGALI SEVA ASHRAM CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI R T NAGAR POST BENGLURU-560 032(JC). …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ERAPPA REDDY M.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTIRCT, BENGALURU-560 009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560 009.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18743 WP No. 2310 of 2015
3.
THE SPECIAL THASILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560 016.
4.
SMT. SUNDARAMMA W/O LATE NAGALINGACHAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.43, I CROSS LAKKASANDRA BENGALURU-560 030.
5. MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT VARTHUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 560 087.
6.
SRI. VASANTHAKUMAR S/O LATE THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT VARTHUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 560 087.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI. N.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R6;
R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RP NO.143/2012-13 ON 01.07.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-E BY RESTORING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN RA.NO.(A)144/2008-09 DATED 29.08.2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18743 WP No. 2310 of 2015
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 01.07.2014 in RP No.143/2012-13 passed by respondent No.1 (Annexure-E).
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent- State that, the impugned order in the present writ petition has been quashed by this court in W.P.No.55929 of 2014 on 22.07.2015 and accordingly, sought for quashing the said order as the same has reached finality.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18743 WP No. 2310 of 2015
4. Taking into
consideration, the finding recorded by the this court at paragraphs 2 and 3, in W.P.No.55929 of 20132, disposed of on 22.07.2015, I am of the view that, the impugned order produced at Annexure-E, is to be quashed and the matter be remitted for fresh consideration, after extending reasonable opportunity to the all parties concerned, by the competent authority. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2