Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20070 (CAL)

SUMAT PRAKASH JAIN v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMISSIONER II

WPA/7231/2015 · 2025-02-25

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.02.2025 Sl. No.: 13 Court No.30 BM WPA 7231 of 2015 Sumai Prakash Jain Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II, Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation & Anr. Mr. Shiv Chandra Prasad ... for the PF Authority Learned counsel for the respondent EPF authority is present. None appears for the petitioner on call in the writ petition of the year 2015. The writ petition is thus dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Urgent Xerox certified copies of this order, if applied for, shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties as expeditiously as possible, in compliance of usual formalities. ( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )