Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20069 (JHR)

RANJEET RAVANI ALIAS RANJEIT RAWANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6935/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23060 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6935 of 2025 Ranjeet Ravani @ Ranjit Ravani, aged about 37 years, son of Dilip Rawani, Resident of -Yogidih, Asansol, PO Yogidih, PS-Chandankitari, District-Bokaro … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Informant (Victim) … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) :Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, APP For the Informant : Mr. N. K. Sahani, Advocate -------- Order No. 02 /Dated: 8th August 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the informant. 3. Taken on record. 4. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Siyaljori PS Case No. 39 of 2024 corresponding to ST Case No. 194 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 354, 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Additional District Judge-IV, Bokaro. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 15.05.2025 as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 6. Learned APP and learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. 7. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the 2025:JHHC:23060 2 allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit