IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos.11358 of 2025 and connected matters. Decided on: 16.07.2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No.11358 of 2025 Vikram Bagga ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar Horticulture University …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No.11362 of 2025 Jagat Ram ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar Horticulture University …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No.11364 of 2025 Vishnu Prasad ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar Horticulture University …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Vandana Misra, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents in all the petitions. 2. Petitioners are serving in the respondent- Dr. Y.S. Parmar University and have prayed for direction to the respondents to grant them work charge status from the date they completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in the writ petitions and the relief prayed for by the petitioners are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent-Department was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to examine their cases in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 - 3 - 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the respective cases of the petitioners in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 16, 2025 Judge R.Atal