Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200662 (ALL)

RAM PRASAD MAURYA v. MR. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

CAPL/3969/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3969 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party states that the representation of the present applicant has been decided in compliance of the order of this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order passed by this Court and prayed to dismiss the instant contempt application as infructuous. 4. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 15, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Prakash Tiwari, Ramkailash Rajbhar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Ram Prasad Maurya .....Applicant(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, District Development Officer .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad