Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22976 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6928 of 2025 Baijnath Yadav, aged about 40 years, son of Late Balmukund Yadav, resident of Village Karma, P.O. Jharpo, P.S. Tatijhariya, District Hazaribag, Jharkhand
...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
--Opposite party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP For the Informant : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate --- 02/08.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Tatijhariya P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 64(1) & 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the occurrence as alleged in the F.I.R has ever been taken place rather the informant has concocted a false story only to save her own skin and for putting pressure upon this petitioner and his family members. Learned counsel further submits that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and he is in custody since 29.04.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned A.P.P. by opposing the prayer for bail of the petitioner submits that there is direct allegation against him for committing rape on the victim girl getting her alone in her house; as such, the petitioner does not deserve the bail.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the nature of allegation made against this petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected, at this stage. Consequently, the bail application is dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
jk