Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010223512018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7450/2018 BIDYA DEVI SINGH W/O LATE JAGNARAYAN SINGH R/O BIRUBARI, THANA GALI, HOUSE NO. 27, P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR, P.S. PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI-16, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS, JANATA BHAWNA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:HONBLE CHIEF MINISTER OFFICE CM BLOCK JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006. 3:GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI - 781005 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 4:GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI - 781001 Page No.# 2/4 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 5:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GUWAHATI CITY PANBAZAR GUWAHATI - 781001. 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CENTRAL DISTRICT ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 781007. 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PALTAN BAZAR POLICE STATION GUWAHATI. 8:SRI ARUN RAVA R/O BIRUBARI THANA GALI P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI - 781016 DIST.KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 9:SMTI. BINA RAVA W/O SRI ARUN RAVA R/O BIRUBARI THANA GALI P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI - 781016 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 10:SRI RAJU SAHA R/O HOUSE NO. 26 Page No.# 3/4 BIRUBARI THANA GALI P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 16 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 11:RAMJIBAN PANDEY R/O- BIRUBARI THANA GALI P.O- GOPINATH NAGAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR GHY- 781016 DIST- KAMRUP(M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S KALITA, MR. S SAHU,MS. P DAS,MR. A C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : MS. D D BARMAN (GA, ASSAM, (R-1,2,5 and 6)), MS S BORO (R-8, R-9, R-11),MR. U DAS (R-8, R-9),MR. S SAIKIA,MS. S KHOUND (SC, GMDA, (R-3)),MR. S BORA (SC, GMC, (R-4)),MR. S SARMA (R-11) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 27.08.2025 Shri G. Das, learned counsel has appeared on instructions of Shri P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that there is no instruction from the client. This writ petition is pending since the year 2018 and the prayers in the petition have also been perused. It also transpires that no steps were taken for service of notice upon the respondent no. 10 in spite of notice being issued in the year 2018 itself. Page No.# 4/4 Considering the above, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is not keen to prosecute with the case. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. Shri S. Bora, learned Standing counsel, GMC & GMDA and Shri J. Handique, learned State Counsel are present. JUDGE Comparing Assistant