HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15442 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prakhar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(a) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to make payment of Rs. 1,48,050/- to the petitioner pursuant to order dated 19.10.2015 and the arrears of salary of the petitioner along with 10% interest per annum from the date, the salary became due within a reasonable time frame preferably within a period of two months. (b) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of interest on Rs. 1,48,050/-compounded annually @ 18% from the date of debit made from the personal account of the petitioner along with penal interest @ 12 % compounded annually from the date of debit made from the personal account of the petitioner. (c) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 17.01.2025 of the petitioner within a reasonable time frame preferably within a period of one month." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nikhil Kumar, Vagish Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vaibhav Tripathi Roop Chand Yadav .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State submit that in case the petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make a fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2-Managing Director, U.P. State Handlooms Corporation Ltd., Kabir Bhawan, G.T. Road, Kanpur, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 15, 2025 Kalp Nath Singh WRIA No. 15442 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad