Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010222982022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/606/2022 HASIBA BEGUM D/O. LT. MAHMUDA BEGUM AND LT. MAHMUD HUSSAIN, VILL. POTIA GAON (AMGURI GHAT), P.O. MELAMATI, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 785632. VERSUS SYEDAIN ABBASI AND 6 ORS THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:DIPTENDU TALUKDAR THE CHIEF ENGINEER OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT. ASSAM HENGERABARI GUWAHATI-36. 3:BHASKAR SARMA THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JORHAT PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DIVISION P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN-785001. 4:GULJARI LAL THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON Page No.# 2/4 BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29. 5:PRITHWISH KUMAR CHAKI THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 6:SAMIR SINHA THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 7:SHRI K.S. GOPINATH NARAYAN THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H SAIKIA, MR. B BORAH,MR. K KALITA,R K HAJONG Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R R Gogoi, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 08.09.2025 Heard Mr. IH Saikia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. RK Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondents no.4 & 7 and learned counsel for the respondents no. 5 & 6. 2] This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate disobedience of Page No.# 3/4 the Judgment and Order dated 30.11.2021 passed in WP(C) No.8395/2019, whereby the petitioner who was a divorced daughter and was dependent on her deceased mother was held to be entitled to the family pension subject to the condition that the authority may be satisfied on the dependency factor by incorporating additional queries, as may deem fit and proper. 3] Mr. RK Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondents no.4 & 7 has filed an affidavit to submit that the Office of the Accountant General has authorized the Family Pension Payment Order(FPPO) bearing No.918314311664 vide Letter no.Pr-3/PHE/2/058642/2023/5276 dated 26.02.2024 and subsequently revised FPPO authority vide Letter No.PR-3/Seq No.9555/A-058642/Rev./2024/119 dated 16.04.2024 which was addressed to the Treasury Officer, Jorhat to make necessary payment. A copy of the same was also sent to the petitioner in her residential address. According to the respondents, the pension is applicable to her with effect from 30.04.2019 i.e. from the date of application in terms of the Government Notification No.PPG(P)/10/2013/49 dated 09.08.2018. 4] Learned counsel for the respondents has placed before the Court a Notification dated 09.08.2018 to submit that by this Notification the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969 stood amended and Rule 143 was amended and after Note-1, Note- 2 to 5 were inserted. For the purpose of the present proceedings Note 3 is relevant and therefore, the same is extracted below: “ Note 3: If at the time of submission of family pension claim, there are no minor children in the family, the family pension shall be paid from the date of filing application by the claimant or from the date of coming into force of this notification whichever is later. No claim for arrear benefit under this clause shall be entertained. Otherwise, the family pension shall be paid from the date following the date of death of the widow/widower as the case may be.” Page No.# 4/4 5] Perusal of the Notification dated 09.08.2018 reveals that Rule 143 stood amended with effect from 09.08.2018 and Note 3 prescribes the payment of family pension from the date of filing the application by the claimant or from the date of coming into force of this notification whichever is later. This requirement is subject to the fact that there are no minor children in the family. Admittedly, in the present proceedings, the petitioner was initially married and latter divorced and subsequently, was dependent on her late mother. Therefore, in terms of Note-3, the petitioner is entitled to the family pension pursuant to the demise of her mother on 17.10.2018, whereafter she applied for the family pension, DCRG, and other retirement benefits. The same has now been considered through the issuance of the family pension order, effective from the date of her application for the release of the family pension. 6] Under such circumstances, this Court finds that the directions contained in the Judgment and Order dated 30.11.2021 passed in WP(C) No.8395/2019 have since been complied with, therefore, the Court at this stage does not wish to proceed any further with the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed. No order as to cost. JUDGE Comparing Assistant