APHC010281232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18569 OF 2020 Between: 1. N RAMESH, S/o. N.Saibaba, Age. 33 years, D.No.54 Prasad Street, Near NVR JS Sai Apartments, 1st Floor LIC Colony, Vijayawada. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secr Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District. 3. The Station House Officer, Penamaluru Police Station, Krishna District. 4. B Nageswara Rao, S/o. Siva Shankar Roa Age 41 years Durga Residency, Tadigadapa Donka Road, Yenamalakudhuru, Vijayawada. 5. B Naga Deepthi, D/o. Rama Rao Aged about 33 years R/o. Sai Working Womens Hostel Nagrjuna Nagar, Vijayawada. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 18569 OF 2020 1. N RAMESH, S/o. N.Saibaba, Age. 33 years, D.No.54-18-34, Ramesh Prasad Street, Near NVR JS Sai Apartments, 1st Floor LIC Colony, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District. 3. The Station House Officer, Penamaluru Police Station, Krishna District. 4. B Nageswara Rao, S/o. Siva Shankar Roa Age 41 years, SF1, Vijaya Durga Residency, Tadigadapa Donka Road, Yenamalakudhuru, Vijayawada. 5. B Naga Deepthi, D/o. Rama Rao Aged about 33 years R/o. Sai Working Womens Hostel Nagrjuna Nagar, Vijayawada. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 34, Ramesh Prasad Street, Near NVR JS Sai Apartments, 1st Floor LIC Colony, ...Petitioner etary, Home 3. The Station House Officer, Penamaluru Police Station, Krishna District. , SF1, Vijaya Durga Residency, Tadigadapa Donka Road, Yenamalakudhuru, Vijayawada. 5. B Naga Deepthi, D/o. Rama Rao Aged about 33 years R/o. Sai Working ...Respondents of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly 2 one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, harassing the petitioner, calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station and sending the Police Constable to the petitioners house regularly and abusing with filthy language with the petitioners family members is bad, illegal and unlawful, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and to direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner, and to pass such other order or Counsel for the Petitioner: K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18569 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “...pleased to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, harassing the petitioner, calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station and sending the Police Constable to the petitioners house regularly and abusing with filthy language with the petitioners family members is bad, illegal and unlawful, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and to direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and to pass..” 02. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that one Bathula Naga Deepthi, 5th respondent herein lodged a complaint on respondent No.5 in Cr.No.573/2020 for the offence punishable under Section 498 (A) IPC and Section 3 & 4 of D.P Act of Penamlur Police Station, Vijayawada. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that, the petitioner, N.Ramesh, got acquainted with respondent No.4 and allegedly threatened her to give divorce to her husband and marry him. As the petitioner was involved in Cr.No.573 of 2020, the police attempted to serve notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. Since the petitioner was not available the same could not be effected. Except that, the police have never called the petitioner to the police station nor harassed him by visiting his house. 4 3. Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow the due process of law in connection with the investigation of Cr.No.573 of 2020. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.08.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18569 of 2020 Dated.21.08.2025 KKV 85