Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20057 (GAU)

ANAMIKA BORAH v. RAJESH GANGULLY

Tr.P.(C)./108/2022 · 2025-04-01

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010222422022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Tr.P.(C)./108/2022 ANAMIKA BORAH W/O. SRI RAJESH GANGULLY, D/O. SRI MONI BORAH, R/O. NEAR SIMULGURI SITALA MANDIR, P.O. AND P.S. SIMULGURI, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN-785686. VERSUS RAJESH GANGULLY S/O. SRI DEBDAS GANGULLY, R/O. OPP. DURGABARI, SUB POST OFFICE, P.O. TINSUKIA, P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R DEV, MS. S BARAT Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 02.04.2025 1. Heard Mr. R. Dev, the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that though this present application has been filed by the petitioner for transfer of Title Suit (M) No. 91/2022, from the Court of the learned District Judge, Tinsukia Assam to the Court of the learned District Judge, Page No.# 2/2 Sivasagar, however, in the meanwhile, the respondent (Sri Rajesh Ganguly, the husband of the present petitioner) has already expired and this transfer petition has become infructuous and accordingly, it may be disposed of. 2. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this transfer petition is closed on becoming infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant