KRISHNA KUMAR (KRISHNA KUMAR YADAV) AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. KRIASHI SHIKSHA EVAM ANUSANDHAN VIBHAG AND 3 OTHERS
/11731/2025 · 2025-10-13
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11731 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to adjust/absorb the petitioners against sanctioned and vacant post of Driver and Peon respectively in the University. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to deduct the contribution of the petitioners and also deposit the contribution of the employer in the NPS account of the petitioners. iii) Such other order or direction deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case, may also be passed. iv) Allow the writ petition with costs." It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the NPS of the petitioners is not being deducted even after several representations and reminders given thereof and ultimately the representation was made on 18.06.2024 whereafter, the State Government made instructions to the Vice- Chancellor concerned to provide a report with respect to the same and a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Chandra Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Krishna Kumar (Krishna Kumar Yadav) And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Kriashi Shiksha Evam Anusandhan Vibhag And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
report has been submitted by the Director(Administration & Monitoring), Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, which is appended as annexure no. 7 of the supplementary affidavit. After arguments at length, he submits that the petitioners may be given liberty to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3/Director(Administration & Monitoring), Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur and the same may be decided within time fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to move a afresh representation, while raising their claims before the the respondent no. 3/Director(Administration & Monitoring), Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, within period of fifteen days and if such representation is moved, the respondent no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within period of two months, from the date, a certified copy of this
order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 11731 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench