Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200542 (ALL)

MANZER IQBAL @ PAPPU v. STATE OF U.P.

CRLA/999/2004 · 2025-10-13

Pramod Kumar Srivastava

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 999 of 2004 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant, Manjre Ikbal @ Pappu, was summoned by this Court. In compliance with the Court's order, the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Barabanki, has submitted a report vide Letter No. 160/2023 dated 28.02.2023 to the Deputy Registrar (Criminal Section) of this Court. The said report emphatically states that the execution of the non-bailable warrant issued against the appellant could not be effected as the appellant, Manjre Ikbal @ Pappu S/o Ikbal Hasnain, is dead, having expired on 05.03.2014. The CJM, Barabanki, has annexed a copy of the death certificate issued by the 30- Prashaskar, along with the sworn statements of four witnesses: CW-1 Ishahaq Khan, CW-2 Mohd. Faheem S/o Abdul Mannan, CW-3 Mohd. Shabbir S/o Mohd. Sameer, and CW-4 Shri Mughees Ahmad S/o Manjar Ikbal, to substantiate the factum of death. In view of above and the report submitted by the CJM, Barabanki, confirming the death of the sole appellant, Manjre Ikbal @ Pappu, makes it clear that the present Criminal Appeal No.999 of 2004 stands abated in terms of Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as abated. The record of the trial court, if called, be sent back forthwith. October 13, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shakeel Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govt.Advocate (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Manzer Iqbal @ Pappu .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench