JYOTI SONWANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/9404/2025 · 2025-10-13
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200521 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200521 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9404 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1.Heard Sri Sukhveer Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major in age and they have solemnized their marriage on their free will and volition at Arya Smaj, Sector-H (Harsh Vihar Purniya) Alilganj, Lucknow as per hindu rites and ritual on 23.09.2025. However, respondent no.5, mother of the petitioner no.1 was not agreed to this marriage, therefore, on her instance police is harassing the petitioners without lodging of any F.I.R. Thus the petitioners are constraint to approach this Court. 3. The petitioners, who have appeared in person, on query, have stated that petitioner no.1 was beaten by respondent no.5 on 22.09.2025 as she wanted to marry with petitioner no.2, however, she left the house and married with each other on 23.09.2025 at Arya Smaj, Sector- H (Harsh Vihar Purniya) Alilganj, Lucknow. 4. On a query made to petitioner no.2, he has specifically stated that he was only threatened by the respondent no.5 on, 22.09.2025 but thereafter neither he nor the petitioner no.1 was threatened and harassed by police or their family members thereafter. The petitioner no.1 accepted the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sukhveer Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jyoti Sonwani And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions dated 26.09.2025 received from Sri Ajeet Pratap Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station Makhi district Unnao, which has been placed before this Court and taken on record, has submitted that no application or complaint against the petitioners have been given by respondent no.5 and petitioners are not being harassed by police. It has further been stated that in case any complaint of harassment is given by the petitioners at the police station, the local police shall accordingly make inquiry and take appropriate action. 6. In view of above, it appears that only to get an order to protect the marriage of the petitioners, this petition has been filed without any sufficient cause. 7.The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
October 13, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 9404 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench