Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200516 (ALL)

RAVINDER JAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/9815/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9815 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.185 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 123, 127(2), 318(4) BNS, P.S. Singahi, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the informant went with the applicant who was assured of visa and subsequently substantial amount of Rs 13 lakhs and odd was paid by the informant and thereafter Rs 5 lakhs was also paid in cash. It is stated that on 10.3.2025 the applicant called the victim on the home and after administering some liquid to her committed wrong on her. Thus it was stated that the victim has been exploited both financially and physically. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the statement under Section 183 BNSS, wherein the victim stated that both of them had married in temple. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant had married the daughter of the informant and medical on record does not corroborate the said allegation. He argues that the applicant is also willing and ready to return the amounts, as taken from the mother of the informant, after he is released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishwakant Srivastava, Anchal Srivastava, Shasank Sonu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravinder Jain .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 18.8.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ravinder Jain be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9815 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench