SUSHIL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/9830/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9830 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None appears of informants despite service of notice.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.96 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)(m), 87, 137(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, Sections 5I/6 POCSO Act and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), P.S. Itaunja, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant was enticed on false pretext of marriage. Physical relations were made since long. Similar statement were given under Section 180 and 183 BNSS. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 year to 19 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the two statements coupled with the facts that the physical relation continued for long period of time, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 10.6.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sushil Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sushil Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9830 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench