PRAMOD PANDEY v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY EDUCATION (DEPTT. SCHOOL EDUCATION LITERACY) NEW DELHI AND 5 OTHERS
/12046/2025 · 2025-10-13
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12046 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate and ASGI assisted by Shri Varun Pandey for respondent/ opposite party no.1 and Shri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent/ opposite party nos.2, 3 and 5.
2. Shri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the respodent nos.2, 3 and 5 has raised preliminary objection that the present writ petition is not maintainable, as the Institute - Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaha, Dabha Semar, Ayodhya, where the petitioner is posted, is notified under Section 14(2) of Administrative Tribunal Act, therefore, he can avail the appropriate remedy.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to contradict the above said contentions.
4. Consequently, the writ petition is hereby dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the proper forum, if he so desires. October 13, 2025 Mohd. Sharif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Nishant Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pramod Pandey .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Education (Deptt. School Education Literacy) New Delhi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench