Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200501 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

/1071/2025 · 2025-10-13

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1071 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has some grievance allegedly in public interest about non-functioning/working of the Gram Panchayat Assistant who has been impleaded by name as opposite party no. 9. 3. However, Ms. Anupama Singh, learned Additional C.S.C. has instructions from the B.D.O. that the opposite party no. 9 is performing her duties, but the Gram Pradhan is not paying her salary. Notice has been issued to the Gram Pradhan in this regard, but he has not paid the remuneration of the opposite party no. 5. 4. On being confronted, the petitioner referred to a show cause notice issued to the opposite party no. 9 by the Gram Panchayat Secretary in this regard. 5. We asked the petitioner's counsel as to from where the aforesaid notices etc. have been obtained by the petitioner, he sought to give some reply that he was the complainant and the notice was pasted at Panchayat Bhawan which was taken by the petitioner. However, we find that the copy of the notice annexed is not one which could be taken out from any place where it may have been pasted. 6. However, without proceeding any further, let the District Panchayat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Ajay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Raj Officer look into the matter of the aforesaid opposite party no. 9 as also other stakeholders and then take such decision, as may be required, as per law. 7. It is made clear that we have not at all recorded any finding against the opposite party no. 9 or in her favour but have left it to the District Panchayat Raj Officer to sort out the matter as early as possible. 8. Ms. Anupama Singh, learned Additional C.S.C. shall communicate our order to the concerned authority. 9. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Shravan WPIL No. 1071 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench