M/S SHRI GANESH TRADERS, RANI BAZAR DIST. GONDA THRU. ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SUMIT KUMAR v. SHRI RAVI RANJAN, M.D., U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORP. LTD., LKO. AND ANOTHER
/2364/2025 · 2025-10-13
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200497 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200497 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2364 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Compliance affidavit filed by Respondent No.1 today is taken on record. 2. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non- compliance of order dated 17.04.2024 passed in Writ C No.3608 of 2025, the same is quoted hereinbelow:
"Let the petitioner implead U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited, Lucknow appropriately as opposite party during course of the day. The payment of the petitioner has been accepted in annexure 1 but with recital that the same would be considered after elections are over. The elections are over long back yet the payment has not been made. Let opposite party no. 2 get the facts verified and do the needful as per law but with expedition say within six weeks. The writ petition is disposed of. "
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondent is accepting the liability / payment to the applicant but till date no payment has been made, which is nothing but non-compliance of the order dated 17.04.2024 passed by the writ court. 4. On the other hand learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the direction was to verify and do the needful as per law. The claim of the applicant / claimant was verified and it was found that he is entitled for payment of Rs.17,20,754/- but due to the poor financial condition request has been made to the State Government for releasing the fund for payment, which is under consideration, so the order passed by the writ court has been complied with. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, it is found that there is no positive direction or writ issued to the respondent Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Singh Kushwaha, Anas Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rajeeva Kumar Sinha M/S Shri Ganesh Traders, Rani Bazar Dist. Gonda Thru. Its Proprietor Shri Sumit Kumar .....Applicant(s) Shri Ravi Ranjan, M.D., U.P. State Agro Industrial Corp. Ltd., Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
for ensuring payment in case it is found that he is entitled for the same. The direction is to verify and do the needful as per law.
The respondents have verified the dues and due to poor financial condition and being the corporation registered under the Companies Act requested the State Government to grant fund for the purpose of payment of dues, so the order passed by the writ court has been complied with as the respondent has verified the facts and has done the needful as directed by the Court. 6. In view of the facts and discussion made hereinabove, the contempt application is devoid of merits, hence dismissed. October 13, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 2364 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench