DIPTI GAUTAM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/9400/2025 · 2025-10-13
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9400 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Heard Sri Devesh Singh and Sri Yash Asthana, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A for the State.
2. On an objection raised by learned A.G.A that this petition is not maintainable before this Court because the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged in the State of Haryana, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the concerned court. To which there is no objection by the other side.
3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. October 13, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devesh Singh, Yash Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Dipti Gautam And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench