Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200486 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR RAWAT v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/9748/2025 · 2025-10-13

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9748 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that all the facilities that were required to be given to the petitioner have been given. 3. With regard to the house that was to be given, the petitioner had earlier sought to get a house in the village and not in the city. However, the petitioner now submits that he is willing to accept the house that is in the city. 4. In light of the same, the respondents-authorities are directed to provide him with the house within a period of six weeks from date. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Raj Kumar Rawat .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Of Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench