PANKAJ CHAUHAN @ (PANKAJ KUMAR ) AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/8081/2025 · 2025-10-13
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200485 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8081 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.645 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No.07 of 2024 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, Ayodhya. 3. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature. This court vide order dated 24.9.2025 had referred the matter to the Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of settlement agreement dated 7.8.2025 between the parties, it is on record. The parties have amicably settled their dispute and further agreed to withdraw the cases going on between them. 4. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Bajpai, Pradeep Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajay Kumar Verma Pankaj Chauhan @ (Pankaj Kumar ) And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the mediation, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 6.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the settlement agreement arrived at between the parties on 7.8.2025 before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court, the present application is allowed and the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.645 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No.07 of 2024 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act), Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, Ayodhya is hereby quashed. October 13, 2025 GauraV/- A482 No. 8081 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench