TIKKU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. REVENUE and 12 ORS.
WRIC/1005931/2005 · 2025-10-13
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200471 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200471 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005931 of 2005 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. The case is called out in revised list.
2. No-one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, however, Sri Devesh Mishra, learned Additional CSC for the respondent - State is present.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 13, 2025 Adarsh K Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tripathi B.G.Balak, Durga Prasad Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Irshad Ali,J.) Tikku .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue And 12 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench