Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200464 (ALL)

MAHESH CHANDRA VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER

/8045/2025 · 2025-10-13

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8045 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge-sheet and summoning order dated 03.09.2020 passed in Session Trial No. 1096 of 2020 related to F.I.R. No. 708 of 2018 u/s 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r) & (s) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Gosainganj, District- Lucknow as well as complete proceeding of the instant case pending in the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lucknow." 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh, Kartikeya Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mahesh Chandra Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8045 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench