HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 805 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non-compliance of order dated 26.07.2023, the judgment extract is quoted hereinbelow:- "Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party No. 3 i.e. Additional Director, Basic Education, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj is directed to decide representation dated 9th May, 2023 by reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. The petitioner shall annex a copy of the aforesaid representation dated 9th May, 2023 along with copy of this order." 2. Learned counsel for respondent has submitted that a compliance affidavit has been filed on 28/30.08.2024 enclosing therein the copy of the order dated 30.06.2024 deciding the representation of the applicant, against which no objection has been filed. The order of the Writ Court has been complied with and the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that the order has not been passed in consonance with the Government Order and the same is bad in the eyes of law. Hence, it is not in compliance of the order passed by the Writ Court. 4. After hearing, learned counsel for parties going through the record of the case, it is found that there was a direction to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order and from the perusal of the order dated 30.06.2024 filed along with the compliance affidavit, it is found that the representation of the applicant has been decided by speaking and reasoned order. 5. In view of the facts and discussion made hereinabove, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surya Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ramesh Chandra Maurya .....Applicant(s) Sanjai Yadav, Addl. Director Basic Education, Prayagraj .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. October 13, 2025 Satish CAPL No. 805 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench