Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20046 (AP)

Ms Gali Anupama, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18549/2020 · 2025-08-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010280782020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18549 OF 2020 Between: 1. Ms Gali Anupama,, W/O Gali Ravindranath, aged 30 Years, R/O 2nd Floor, D No. 4-11, Pillakaluva Street, Nerelamma Temple Center, Indrapalem, Kakinada, east Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principle Secretary (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head Quarters, Mangalgiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House Officer, Indrapalem, Police Station, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Gali Ravindranath, S/o. Late Prabhudas, aged 32 Years, Occ Pastor, R/O Flat No. A2, 1st Floor, Sanjana Apartments, Savithri Nagar, Hakumpeta, Rajamahendravaram, Andhra Pradesh. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 18549 OF 2020 1. Ms Gali Anupama,, W/O Gali Ravindranath, aged 30 Years, R/O 2nd Floor, 11, Pillakaluva Street, Nerelamma Temple Center, Indrapalem, Kakinada, east Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND ate of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principle Secretary (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head untur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House Officer, Indrapalem, Police Station, East Godavari ath, S/o. Late Prabhudas, aged 32 Years, Occ Pastor, R/O Flat No. A2, 1st Floor, Sanjana Apartments, Savithri Nagar, Hakumpeta, Rajamahendravaram, Andhra Pradesh. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Ms Gali Anupama,, W/O Gali Ravindranath, aged 30 Years, R/O 2nd Floor, 11, Pillakaluva Street, Nerelamma Temple Center, Indrapalem, ...Petitioner ate of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principle Secretary (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Police Head 3. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada, East 4. The Station House Officer, Indrapalem, Police Station, East Godavari ath, S/o. Late Prabhudas, aged 32 Years, Occ Pastor, R/O Flat No. A2, 1st Floor, Sanjana Apartments, Savithri Nagar, Hakumpeta, 2 6. Nirogi Lakshmi Prasanna, , W/O Shiva Kumar, aged 30 Years, R/O D No. 2-352/11, Near Beyershaba Church, Employees Colony, Indrapalem, Kakinada Rural, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Narala Shiva Rama Krishna, S/o. Nagabhushanam, aged 42 Years, R/0 1st Floor, D No. 4-11, Pillakaluva Street, Nerelamma Temple Center, Indrapalem, Kakinada, east Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the crime and in not taking action on the report made by the petitioner dated 28.08.2020 which is sent through Register post, as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to the verdict passed by the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. State as well as abuse of power of police, consequentially direct the 4th respondent to take action against the respondent 5 to 7 herein basing on the report made by the petitioner dated 28.08.2020 by registering the crime forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent to take action against the respondent 5 to 7 herein basing on the report made by the petitioner dated 28.08.2020 by registering the crime forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18549 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the crime and in not taking action on the report made by the petitioner dated 28.08.2020 which is sent through Register post, as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to the verdict passed by the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. State as well as abuse of power of police, consequentially direct the 4th respondent to take action against the respondent 5 to 7 herein basing on the report made by the petitioner dated 28.08.2020 by registering the crime forthwith and to pass…” 2. This grievance of the petitioner is that despite submitted a report dated 28.08.2020 by registered post, the 4th respondent has not registered a crime and has not taken any action on the said report. Hence, this petitioner has been filed seeking a direction to the police to register a crime basing on the said report. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the details of such representation/report are not available in the records, particularly since the period in question was during the COVID-19 pandemic. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation 4 before the 4th respondent, if the earlier representation dated 28.08.2020 is not available on record or in case the representation was not considered by the police for registration of the crime it is always open to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.08.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18549 of 2020 Dated.21.08.2025 KKV 88 6