Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200449 (ALL)

PINTU SINGH @ ASHUTOSH PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/9488/2025 · 2025-10-13

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9488 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 4 is dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 23.9.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0249 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 109(1), 351(2), 352 of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and 3(1)(d), 3(2)(i), 3(2)(iv) and 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act, 2015, P.s. Kotwali Dehat, District Pratapgarh. 4. After arguing at some length learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court. 5. Without entering into the merits of the issue, on the innocuous request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of this writ petition by giving liberty to the petitioners to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court within three weeks from today. October 13, 2025/Om Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhanshu Singh, Rachna Shukla, Shiv Kumar Yadav, Tushar Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Pintu Singh @ Ashutosh Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench