HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9785 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of some defects in the writ petition he does not want to press the writ petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Sri Sandeep Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Balram Yadav, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 have no objection against the aforesaid request. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Let certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. October 13, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gauri Shankar Maurya, Dushyant Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Balram Yadava (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Kishore .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench