DEEPAK YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10147/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10147 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.249 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1), 333 of BNS and Section 5(M)/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 3. Initially the bail application was reported by the Office as an Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail No.1489 of 2025 whereas the same was regular bail and on the direction of this Court, the office has converted the bail application from Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail No.1489 of 2025 to present criminal misc. bail application. 4. The Registry is directed to ensure that such mistake are not repeated in future. 5. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was raped by the applicant on 13.07.2025. It was also alleged that when the victim had resisted, the applicant made a false promise of marriage. Subsequently, in the statements under Section 180 and 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that she had gone with the applicant out of her own freewill. 6. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Considering the statements of the victim and the fact that the fact that the tentative age of the victim is around 17 years coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 25.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.
Let the applicant Deepak Yadav be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10147 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench