Ajad Ali and 2 Others v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
/9525/2025 · 2025-10-13
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9525 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. This petition has been filed through e-mode and learned counsel for the petitioners has provided photocopy of the petition, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties no. 1 to 3.
3. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with.
4. By means of this petition, the petitioners have assailed the impugned FIR No.0305/2025, under Sections 3(5), 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. read with Sections 3(2)(V), 3(2)(Va) and 3(1)(Dha) of the S.C./S.T. Act lodged at Police Station Qasimpur, District Hardoi.
5. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners has requested that the petitioners may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the innocuous aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Pratap, Saad Husain, Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajad Ali And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
competent court of law within three weeks, taking all the pleas and grounds available to them, and if such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 MVS/- CRLP No. 9525 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench