HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9698 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Heard Shri Pratyush Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vishal Tahlani, learned Standing Counsel for the State of UP, and Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 4, Gram Sabha, Gram Panchayat Sakhin Ramuapur, District Hardoi. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the District Magistrate, Hardoi, for taking appropriate action on the petitioner's complaint made against the village Pradhan. The Village Pradhan, against whom the complaint has allegedly been made, has not been made an opposite party in the present writ petition. On the basis of written instructions, learned Standing Counsel informed the court that the complaint submitted by the petitioner has not been received in the office of the District Magistrate. However, one Shri Vinod Singh, who is also a Member of the Gram Panchayat, has made a complaint against the Gram Pradhan. The contents thereof are similar to the complaint allegedly made by the petitioner, and action has also been instituted on the basis of the opposite complaint made by Shri Vinod Singh, and an inquiry officer has been appointed. A copy of the instructions is being taken on record. As action is already being taken on a similar complaint submitted against Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratyush Kumar Srivastava, Shivanshu Shishodiya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Sandeep .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the Village Pradhan by another Member of the Gram Panchayat, no action is warranted in the instant writ petition. The instant writ petition is disposed of accordingly. October 13, 2025 A.Nigam WRIC No. 9698 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench