Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200414 (ALL)

RAM SAGAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.

/12636/2024 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12636 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.264 of 2024, under Section 105, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 BNS, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 2.9.2024 the daughter of the informant aged about 20 years was attacked by the applicant by use of lathi, danda etc which resulted in substantial injuries. In the light of the said allegations, learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the post mortem report which records (1) contused swelling of lower abdomen, (2) contused swelling at right labia and (3) contusion behind right knee joint. The cause of death is antemortem septicemia. The tentative age of victim is around 18 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the cause of death and no recovery from the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 21.9.2024 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ram Sagar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh, Anjana Pandey, Pramod Kumar Singh, Sushil Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Sagar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12636 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench