Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20041 (PNJ)

RAHUL RATHEE AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

CWP/2739/2025 · 2025-01-31

Harsh Bunger

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APURVA 2025.02.05 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh the same were also sent at their address; however, the house of the petitioners was found locked, and therefore, the passports were returned undelivered, on account of which, the same are still lying with the Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh. 2.1 Learned counsel for the respondent/Union of India submits that the petitioners may be directed to approach the Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh, whereupon their passports would be handed over to them. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, keeping in view the aforesaid stand taken by learned counsel for the respondent/Union of India, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh with a request of collecting their respective passports. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. In case, petitioners approach the Regional Passport Office, Chandigarh with a request of collecting their passports, the same shall be considered by the concerned office/officer subject to any other legal impediment therein. 6. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. APURVA 2025.02.05 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh