HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9814 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 11.07.2024 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Dalmau, District Raebareli is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Pavan Kumar And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench