BABLI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/9800/2025 · 2025-10-13
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9800 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard Shri Farooq Ayoob, learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no.2 and 3 for compliance of order dated 28.11.2020 passed by learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Barabanki, in case no.2752/2020, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties no.2 and 3 disposal of the petitioner's representation dated 29.07.2025 as early as possible in the interest of justice (contained as Annexure no.2 of this writ petition)." At the outset, it may be noticed that the petitioner seeks the compliance of the order dated 28.11.2020 passed in proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. A specific query was put to the counsel for the petitioner as to whether any appropriate application has per law has been moved for implementing the order to which Sri Farooq Ayoob submits that no such application has been moved. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is misconceived and is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooq Ayoob, Mansi Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Babli .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take recourse as may be available to her in law. October 13, 2025 ank WRIC No. 9800 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench