HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12055 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama has been filed by Shri Anagh Shukla, Advocate on behalf of respondent/ opposite party nos.2 to 4. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Shri Surendra Kumar Singh and Shri Anagh Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4. 3. Shri Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel, informs that he has already filed Vakalatnama in the Registry. 4. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties the matter is being decided finally. 5. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.08.2021 and at the time of his retirement, when he was not paid gratuity, he staked his claim for being paid gratuity. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that now the only question which remains is the payment of interest on gratuity amount from the date the petitioner retired till the actual payment of gratuity. 7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a representation for payment of interest on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Prakash Yadav, Shrankhla Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anagh Shukla, Surendra Kumar Singh Gautam Kumar Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Krishi Vipran And Videsh Vyapar Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) delayed payment of gratuity. The said representation would be preferred before respondent no.2 within two weeks along with certified copy of this order. In case, the representation is made, the respondent no.2 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks. October 13, 2025 Mohd. Sharif WRIA No. 12055 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench