Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200392 (ALL)

C/M MADARSA JAMIA LATEEFIYA THRU. PRINCPAL,FARUK ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. MINI. WELFARE DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/9832/2025 · 2025-10-13

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9832 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sayyed Farooq Ahmad, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Trideep Narayan Pandey, the learned State Counsel. 2. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by "C/M Madarsa Jamia Lateefiya, Piprahwa through its Principal Faruk Ali" assailing validity of an order dated 01.05.2025 passed by the District Minority Welfare Officer, Shrawasti stating that the Madarsa was being run without renewal of its recognition and stopping the educational activities in the Madarsa. 4. Learned State Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petition has been filed through Principal, who is not authorized to act for the Committee of Management of Madarsa. 4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the petition and he seeks liberty for the appropriate person/authority to file a fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. October 13, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sayyed Farooq Ahmad, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Afzal Ahmad Siddiqui (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) C/M Madarsa Jamia Lateefiya Thru. Princpal,Faruk Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Mini. Welfare Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench