RAKESH PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
/9348/2025 · 2025-10-13
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200385 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200385 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9348 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 to 3 and Sri Indra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the F.I.R. No.0453 of 2025 dated 31.08.2025 under Sections 318 (4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) B.N.S., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya.
3. A perusal of the F.I.R. indicates that cognizable offence is made out.
4. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Niharika Infrastructure Private Limited vs. State of Maharashtra : 2021 (19) SCC 401 has categorically held that it is only in cases where no cognizable offence or offence of any kind is disclosed in the first information report that the Court will not permit an investigation to go on.
5. As already indicated above, once a perusal of the FIR indicates cognizable offences are made out against the petitioner consequently there cannot be any occasion for interference in the F.I.R.
6. Considering the aforesaid, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition stands dismissed. October 13, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Preet Kaur, Sridhar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Indra Pratap Singh (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Rakesh Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench