HARIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY, LKO AND ANOTHER
/9837/2025 · 2025-10-13
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9837 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Devendra Mohan Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 26.07.2022 passed by the respondent No.2 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil, Motipur, District- Bahraich.
3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has got a remedy of filing an appeal against the aforesaid order.
4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the petition and he will seek the remedy of filing an appeal before appropriate forum.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. October 13, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Hariram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Food And Civil Supply, Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench