GEETA SAHU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/9813/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9813 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.12 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 324(2), 108 BNS, P.S. Umari Begumganj, District Gonda.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the son of the informant was married to the daughter of the applicant. Subsequently after marriage the son of the informant was called and he went on 2.1.2025. An altercation took place in which he was harassed because of which he committed suicide by hanging. In the light of the said allegations learned counsel for the applicants argues that as per post mortem report the cause of death is ante mortem hanging. As per FIR and the allegations there is no material to suggest as defined under the Act for implication under Section 108 BNS.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicants who are in jail since 31.8.2025 having no criminal history are entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicants Geeta Sahu and Kajal Sahu be released on bail in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Geeta Sahu And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid FIR number on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9813 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench