LALMAN @ LALMANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
/9540/2025 · 2025-10-13
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200358 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200358 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9540 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Mohan Singh,
learned counsel has accepted notice for the respondent No.4.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks implementation of an order passed in proceedings under Section 41 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 dated
12.07.2019.
3. A specific query was put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether an appropriate application has been moved before the authority concerned in terms of the Rule 460 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to which it has been informed by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not filed such an application.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to move an appropriate application before the authority concerned to take his grievances before the appropriate authority .
5. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 13, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Harshita Gupta, Saddam Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Lalman @ Lalmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench