HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9418 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Meva Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed with following main prayers:- "(i). To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a Mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the fair and proper opp. party no.3 to conduct investigation, in pursuance of first information report lodged in case crime no. 0323/2025 under section 75 (2), 333, 115 (2), 352, 351 (3) of BNS & section 3 (1) (D), 3 (1) (Dha) & 3 (2) (va) of S.C./S.T. Act, at registered at Police Station -Sirsiya, District Shrawasti, so that the petitioner could get justice, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. (ii). To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no.3 to arrest of the accused persons/opp. party no.4 to 7, in pursuance of first information report lodged in case crime no. 0323/2025 under section 75 (2), 333, 115 (2), 352, 351 (3) of BNS & section 3 (1) (D), 3 (1) (Dha) & 3 (2) (va) of S.C./S.T. Act, at registered at Police Station -Sirsiya, District Shrawasti, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was lodged on 19.08.2025, but till date, investigation has not been concluded. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State, on the basis of instructions, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Harshita Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Kamla Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) submits that the investigation is going on. He further submits that the investigation shall be concluded expeditiously. 5. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with direction to the S.S.P./S.P., Shrawasti to ensure that the investigation is concluded expeditiously, failing which, the petitioner shall have liberty to approach the concerned Magistrate in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2008) 2 SCC 409. October 13, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 9418 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench