HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9917 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 23.09.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 2 i.e. District Magistrate, Raebareli should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2 - District Magistrate, Raebareli is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Om Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Rahat Ayukta Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 9917 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench