- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 WRIT PETITION NO. 7042 OF 2014 MANKARNABAI SULBA RAIWADE AND OTHERS VERSUS SUMANBAI VISHWANATH NARVADE AND OTHERS Mr.S.B.Ghatolpatil, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ( CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. ) DATE : JUNE 12, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocate Mr.Ghatol Patil for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. It is informed Adv.Godsay had filed appearance for the petitioners and during the pendancy of the petition, he had expired. Nobody had filed vakalatnama for the petitioners. 2. The learned Advocate for the respondents submits that the controversy involved in the petition is with respect to the challenge to the order passed on amendment application. However, during the pendency of the instant petition, RCS No.78/2011 is itself compromised in between the parties and as such, the instant petition has become infructuous. He tenders across the bar order dated 17.11.2015 passed khs/June 2025/7042 2025:BHC-AUG:14864 - 2 - by the Trial Court recording the compromise. The same is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification purpose. He submits that in view of this, the petition has become infructuous. This statement is accepted. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, as infructuous. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. ) khs/June 2025/7042