Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200347 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FINANCE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/12053/2025 · 2025-10-13

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12053 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pallavi Singh Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Ram Kumar Singh learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 15th June, 2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from Ayodhya to Sonbhadra. 3. It has been submitted that against aforesaid transfer order, petitioner has submitted a representation dated 14th July, 2025 in view of adverse family conditions and serious illness of his mother. It is submitted that aforesaid representation is still pending consideration. 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director, Treasury, U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench