MANISH KUMAR GOLDAR ,PROPRIETOR AND MANAGING DIRECTOR OF GOLDAR HOSPITAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/9415/2025 · 2025-10-13
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9415 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Suyesh Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In view of proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 688 of 2025, under Sections 281, 106(1), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.S., Police Station Sadar, District Kheri. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondents-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, (2022) 10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Manish Kumar Goldar ,Proprietor And Managing Director Of Goldar Hospital .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re: Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, It is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 30.10.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant.
October 13, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 9415 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench