HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12027 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 8 while power on behalf of opposite party no.9 has been filed by Mr. Om Prakash Yadav, which is taken on record. 2. Petition has been filed challenging the appointment dated 24.06.2025 of opposite party no.9 on the post of Anganbadi Worker in the Centre concerned. 3. It has been submitted that the impugned selection was being done on the basis of incorrect income certificate submitted by opposite party no.9, against which petitioner has already filed his objections which are pending consideration. 4. Learned counsel for opposite parties have refuted submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner but admitted that objection are pending. 5. In view of aforesaid, without entering into merits of the case, since impugned selection is on the basis of the income certificate issued in favour of opposite party no.9, the petitioner is granted liberty to pursue the objections filed against income certificate of opposite party no.9. The authority concerned is directed to consider and decide such objection expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon him after affording opportunity of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jagroopan Nishad, Pramendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Km. Bharti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) hearing to opposite party no.9 (Pooja wife of Vinay Kumar). 6. In case the income certificate of opposite party no.9 is cancelled or revoked, consequences pertaining to the said post shall ensue. 7. With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 12027 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench