RAMMILAN TIWARI @ GHIRRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/7740/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200303 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200303 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7740 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Naveen Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.30 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 109(1), 191 (2), 351 (3), 352, 61(2) B.N.S., P.S. Ramgaon, District Bahraich. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 25.1.2025 at about 10 AM the cousin brother of the informant was going towards the agricultural fields where three accused including the applicant started hitting with the use of lathi, danda etc which subsequently resulted in his death. The cause of death as per the post mortem report is ante mortem injury. In the light of the same learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the statement recorded wherein general allegations were levelled against all the accused and nothing specific were stated that the applicant. The applicant is aged about 65 years and has criminal antecedents of minor offence as disclosed in paragraph 41 of the bail application. 5. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 6. Solely considering the age of the applicant and there being nothing Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Naveen Kumar Pandey Rammilan Tiwari @ Ghirra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
specific against the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 27.1.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Rammilan Tiwari @ Ghirra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 8. It is made clear that the grand of bail shall not be seen as parity for other co accused as the bail application is allowed only on the consideration of the age of the applicant. 9. It is further directed that the statement of the victim shall be recorded expeditiously the trial court. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7740 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench