Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200300 (ALL)

RAHUL SINGH @ KALLO SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1414/2025 · 2025-10-13

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1414 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.165/2025 under sections 109, 115(2), 352, 3(5)BNS, P.S. Karaundikalan, district Sultanpur. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vidya Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Singh @ Kallo Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). October 13, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1414 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench